Smart Democracy (1) Due to the democratic governance of Thailand when the people's party promoters seized the rule from an absolute monarchy to a democratic regime on June 24, 1932, during the reign of King Rama VII. His long-standing vision that His Highness already wished to bring democracy to the Thai people. However, His Highness foresaw that the Thai people were not ready for democratic rule. When a civil society group made up of military, police and civil servants who have witnessed the prosperity of the civilized nation wishes to follow in their footsteps. But most of the people of the country still lack democratic learning. or having a democratic consciousness This means that most Thai people are not ready. He therefore had a speech in one part saying: “I am delighted and willing to delegate my former powers to the Thai people. But I will not agree to surrender my power to any group of people to exercise power. without listening to the voices of the people." from the events of the revolutionary change in the governance of the People's Party from the absolute monarchy system to the present It took more than 74 years to find that Thailand's democratic governance still has problems. and still unable to follow a sustainable democratic path You will find that there is always a change in the form of revolution and coup d'etat. The democratic base was also shaken and created the conditions for a coup d'état. This is something Thai people should think about why. So Thailand's democracy is not moving forward? Why is it different from a developed country? Or other countries that have already developed a lot of democracy? The problem of democracy stems from the individual. Or is it caused by a man-made system, or from a culture of falsely instilled values that make the democratic path look downhill? before reaching the problem or seeking alternative democratic approaches proposed by the authors to society for the society to recognize and create democratic rules with consciousness and not understanding democracy but just the sapwood bark Thai people should have access to the essence of democracy. Because democracy is not just a form that has a parliament, a House of Representatives, a House of Representatives, or just a constitution. But more importantly That is conscience or democratic spirit. It is found that the government rarely promotes or cultivates each other in this regard. We find that there is no learning of democracy in the classroom, no serious systematic curriculum for teaching children to adults. This is because the democratic way is a delicate thing. And it is a western culture that Thailand has brought in ideas or imitated from the West. Understanding that democracy is having a parliament, having a parliament, having elections, voting, having a political party, etc., which is actually just a form of democracy. but should also be democratic in terms of content such as having a democratic ideology and consciousness, civic participation in politics (Citizenship), knowing the rights and duties, knowing the responsibility to the public. By participating in politics at all levels, constructive criticism for the benefit of the nation without self-interest, respect for the rights and rules of the country, upholding the consensus of the majority. and protection of minority votes (Majority Rule, Minority Right), development of political institutions and democratic community way The democratic pillar was demolished. and being shaken by not understanding or know deeply enough to maintain a democratic way Therefore, the important thing for democracy to survive is that people must have the view that democracy is a pillar. If you fall down, the house will collapse. or can tilt must strive to make the pillars stable And help each other to support any group of people, any profession, must have a cherished nature that no one can invade It is the stability of a democratic society. It is not a democracy like a banana plant that has been raised for a few years before it has to be cut down and eaten by its creator. But we will find that most Thai people have very little understanding. and cannot understand how to maintain democracy that Thai people cherish Therefore, it may be a trap that makes some people or some committees have used undemocratic methods but can be impersonated If a person is a leader who doesn't care or do not fully understand the way of democratic governance which the form of democracy originated from the absolute monarchy until now It can be divided into eras as follows: 1. The era of the People's Party demanding democratic governance which consisted of the military, police, and civilians from 1932-1956 2. The coup era called a revolution which often occurs frequently from 1957 – 1973 onwards 3. Shift to a civilian government From Sanya Thammasak Government, Thaninon Kraiwichian Government, General Prem Tinsulanonda Government, Chuan Leekpai Government, Chatchai Choonhavan's Government 4. The era of the coup against the civilian government such as General Suchinda Kraprayoon or the Tamil May era 5. The era of civilian government that is a business style government in a populism style. Emphasis on fast work and globalization. including the government during the era of Dr. Thaksin

ความคิดเห็น

โพสต์ยอดนิยมจากบล็อกนี้

ระบบการเมืองที่ดีเหมือนปลาในอ่างแก้วที่มองเห็นตัวปลาชัดเจน

ตัวแบบจำลองภารกิจของแอสริช (Ashridge Mission Model)

การปฏิรูปการศึกษาในต่างประเทศ